Early Risers Coffee Shop ® (  

Go Back   Early Risers Coffee Shop ® ("Where Friends enjoy Friends") > Coffee Shop

Coffee Shop This Board was established along the lines of a Virtual Coffee Shop, with the idea of having a place to relax, visit and discuss the days happenings, and exchange information about different topics.

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-12-2018, 10:14 AM   #1
Extraordinary Member
J_B's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NW Montana
Age: 62
Posts: 4,217
Default Kavanaugh a 'mixed bag' on 2nd Amendment

Kavanaugh a 'mixed bag' on 2nd Amendment

President Trump's pick for the U.S. Supreme Court, Judge Brett Kavanaugh, will be assailed by gun-control advocates as a likely judicial tyrant bent on arming children with machine guns. How does Kavanaugh look from our Montana perspective?

Unfortunately, the expected opposition to Kavanaugh by gun control extremists is not as comforting as it could be. From an East Coast or D.C. perspective Kavanaugh may look like a Second Amendment supporter, but from our more liberty-oriented Montana perspective he is a mixed bag.

Kavanaugh does believe that Second Amendment infringements should be subject to a strict scrutiny level of judicial review, a relatively high barrier. He thinks that semi-auto rifles deserve the same protection as the Supreme Court afforded semi-auto pistols in its Heller decision. But, he also thinks that much of the gun control currently applied across the U.S. may be tolerable notwithstanding the Second Amendment.

Kavanaugh's written history with the Second Amendment is in the context of D.C. As a longtime D.C. denizen, Kavanaugh thought that the effective D.C. gun ban laws were inconsistent with the Second Amendment. That's good, but that's not so impressive from our Montana perspective.

From our more liberty-oriented Montana perspective, recognizing constitutional prohibition to an outright and effectively total gun ban is not something to cheer about. Here, we're more concerned about less direct infringements such as a universal background checks (a euphemism for requiring that all private firearm transfers be recorded on federal computers), waiting periods to purchase firearms, making a visit to a psychologist grounds for an indefinite firearms possession disability, gun confiscation orders and more.

It appears as if Kavanaugh would see such infringements through the lens of a D.C. insider, and maybe think them tolerable in fly-over country like Montana. That's not consistent with our Big Sky perspective.

Second Amendment scholar Dave Kopel writes about Kavanaugh in more detail at: http://reason.com/volokh/2018/07/09/...cond-amendment.

He concludes: "Judge Kavanaugh's text, history, and tradition methodology for Second Amendment cases will not please people who believe that all gun control is impermissible, nor will it please advocates who want to make the Second Amendment a second-class right."

The best that can be said about Kavanaugh is that he would likely interpret and enforce the Constitution and laws as written, and not seek or invent unwritten and hidden meaning between the lines. And, he will probably hold government accountable to a narrow reading of authority granted by the Constitution or Congress.

Those positives are enough to warrant support for Kavanaugh's confirmation. However, Montana gun owners should not view Kavanaugh as a champion for the individual liberty that our founders intended to preserve and protect.

Gary Marbut of Missoula is president of the Montana Shooting Sports Association, author of "Gun Laws of Montana," a veteran firearms safety instructor, and accepted in state and federal courts as an expert concerning self defense and related topics.

J_B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2018, 12:22 PM   #2
rman's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Northeast Kansas
Age: 75
Posts: 35,612

Well he wouln't meet our criteria here in Kansas as the perfect candidate either. I am happy that Trump has the opportunity to appoint another conservative judge to the court though. We dodged the bullet of Obama appointing 2 judges. We all know how that would have turned out. Also, his final confirmation is not a sure thing, especially if the dems get to a few republican senators like McCain.
I used to be short, young and good looking. Believe it or not, I'm still short.
rman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2018, 01:40 AM   #3
ZO6Vettever's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Central Florida, the "Gunshine" State
Age: 71
Posts: 34,261

I don't know enough about him to have a valid opinion.
Sent from my rotary phone.

Hero's don't wear capes, they wear dog tags or badges.
US Army vet 1965-1971
ZO6Vettever is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Early Risers Coffee Shop ® Registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office